From a legal point of view, apologizing provides both parties. When a state commits an wrongful act which accepted that caused a damage it wiil be a reparation is provided for the victim states. While peace is ensured, the legal responsibility of reparation is fulfilled at the same time. The main purpose of apology within states is to continue their existence in the international system. Also states can sometimes apologize to realize their interests. For example Japan used apology pragmatically to be visible in Asia again.
Japan also softens the responsibility of the apology by stating that there are sometimes aggrieved parties by japanese in its apologies. Diplomatic apology is effective for both states and people. It has been seen that the states that apologize for their war crimes are more advantageous in international politics.
It has also become more difficult for states that apologize democratically to be accepted as enemies. Apart from gaining sympathy in the international system, there are other advantages for states to apologizing. The main feature of diplomatic apologies by states which committed war crimes is accepted as peaceful state in United Nations system despite everything. Bilder, R. Fleury, J. Goffman, E. In: Goffman, E. Kampf, Z. Verschueren Eds. Lind, J. Scherr, A. This being so, a second-best alternative has been to attempt to control the size of military forces and, therefore, the bloodshed.
This is also not the case by which humanity has worked over the previous centuries. Rather, the clear assumption for thousands of years has been that authorities are allowed to build the size of their armed forces as large as they wish. The restraints that have been applied are in terms of the quality and methods by which combatants are taken. The considerations pertain to questions of biology such as age and sex, geographical considerations such as nationality, and the multiple nuances of informal or formal combatants.
These questions have also overlapped with ones of compulsion and whether citizens within a country can be compelled to fight without their consent. Accordingly, for the previous 3, years, the question has not been whether there should be a limit on the number of soldiers, but rather who is or is not a lawful combatant. It has rarely been a question of numbers. It has been, and remains, one of type. The second part of this book is about people, typically combatants, captured in battle.
It is about what happens to their status as prisoners, about the possibilities of torture, assistance if they are wounded and what happens to their remains should they be killed and their bodies fall into enemy hands. The theme that ties all of these considerations together is that all of the acts befall those who are, to one degree or another, captives of their enemies.
As such, they are no longer masters of their own fate. As a work of reference this first volume, as part of a set of three, is unrivalled, and will be of immense benefit to scholars and practitioners researching and advising on the laws of warfare.
It also tells a story which throws fascinating new light on the history of international law and on the history of warfare itself. The author shows that as long as humanity has been waging wars it has also been trying to find ways of legitimising different forms of combatants and ascribing rules to them, protecting civilians who are either inadvertently or intentionally caught up between them, and controlling the use of particular classes of weapons that may be used in times of conflict.
Thus it is that this work is divided into three substantial parts: Volume 1 on the laws affecting combatants and captives; Volume 2 on civilians; and Volume 3 on the law of arms control. This second book on civilians examines four different topics. The first topic deals with the targetting of civilians in times of war. This discussion is one which has been largely governed by the developments of technologies which have allowed projectiles to be discharged over ever greater areas, and attempts to prevent their indiscriminate utilisation have struggled to keep pace.
The second topic concerns the destruction of the natural environment, with particular regard to the utilisation of starvation as a method of warfare, and unlike the first topic, this one has rarely changed over thousands of years, although contemporary practices are beginning to represent a clear break from tradition.
The final topic in this volume is about the theft or destruction of the property of the enemy, in terms of either pillage or the intentional devastation of the cultural property of the opposition. As a work of reference this set of three books is unrivalled, and will be of immense benefit to scholars and practitioners researching and advising on the laws of warfare.
Jubal A. Great book, War Crimes pdf is enough to raise the goose bumps alone. Add a review Your Rating: Your Comment:. Shadows Rising by Madeleine Roux. Rise of the Horde by Christie Golden. Before the Storm by Christie Golden. Beyond the Dark Portal by Aaron Rosenberg. Illidan by William King.
0コメント